AI Control Matrix: When to Trust, When to Verify

Also: How to Build Foolproof Controls for Accounts Payable Automation

Welcome to this week’s edition of Balanced AI Insights. Last week, we explored the importance of bulletproof controls in AI-driven financial workflows. This week, we’re taking it a step further by introducing the concept of the AI Control Matrix—a structured framework that maps critical control points across automated processes.

We’ll break down how to build this framework step by step, ensuring that your automation remains fast, accurate, and fully compliant. 

If you’ve been wondering how to balance the speed of AI with the assurance of accuracy, this is the guide you’ve been waiting for.

📢 Upcoming Events for Finance Leaders – Save the Dates!

As many of my readers might know, I’m not only a newsletter author but also an expert in the AI Finance Club, a community of finance executives and leaders committed to mastering AI. 

Nicolas Boucher leads this community, and next Tuesday, he’s hosting a live webinar exclusively for CFOs, Fractional CFOs, and Finance Directors.

In this session, Nicolas will break down how AI is reshaping the CFO role, the tools that top finance leaders are already using, and practical strategies that can elevate your finance processes. Highly recommend!

📅 When: Tuesday, May 27th | 5:00 PM CET / 11:00 AM ET

Seats are limited—grab yours now!

The Balanced View: How to Trust Automation Without Losing Control

As AI increasingly drives complex workflows, the need for strategic oversight becomes paramount. Mistakes in these areas compromise compliance, stakeholder trust, and long-term business stability.

The AI Control Matrix serves as the blueprint for mapping automated workflows to critical control points. It is designed to allow Trust but Verify—you trust AI to perform routine tasks efficiently, but you verify its outputs at key points to catch errors before they escalate.

Why Controlling AI Systems Is Different

Unlike traditional rule-based automation, AI-driven processes do not always deliver consistent outputs. Rule-based systems follow strict, predefined logic—if the inputs are the same, the outputs are always the same. AI, however, operates on probabilistic models, which means that even with identical inputs, the outputs can slightly vary depending on changes in data patterns, model updates, or even randomness built into the algorithms.

This unpredictability is why control points are absolutely crucial. A well-structured Control Matrix accounts for these variations, setting strategic checkpoints to verify critical outputs and minimize risks.

Building the AI Control Matrix: Step by Step

Step 1: Map the Workflow

The first step is to document each AI-driven workflow in its entirety. This means understanding:

  • Inputs: What data feeds into the process?

  • Processes: What calculations or decisions are AI-powered?

  • Outputs: What deliverables does AI generate?

Example: For automated budget forecasting, inputs would include historical budget data, market indicators, and current expenditures. The AI processes would generate predictions, while outputs would be quarterly forecasts ready for review.

Step 2: Define Control Points

AI should be trusted to handle repetitive, structured tasks, but verification is crucial at key decision points. These checkpoints should be applied at:

  • Data Ingestion: Validating that inputs are accurate and complete before analysis begins.

  • Calculation and Processing: Reviewing interim calculations for signs of anomalies.

  • Output Generation: Final review of AI-generated reports before distribution.

Example Control Points:

  • Data Integrity Checks: Ensure the data ingested matches source records.

  • Variance Analysis Verification: Cross-check AI-generated variance reports with historical trends.

  • Compliance Confirmation: Verify that all generated reports meet regulatory standards.

Step 3: Assess Risk and Adjust Control Depth

Not all processes are created equal. High-risk tasks require deeper scrutiny, while low-risk tasks can be monitored with lighter touchpoints.

Pro Tip: For high-risk workflows, consider multiple verification layers. For instance, AI-driven budget forecasts should be reviewed at both departmental and executive levels.

Step 4: Implement and Test the Control Matrix

A Control Matrix is only effective if it's tested rigorously.

  • Start with one critical workflow and monitor its performance.

  • Identify gaps and adjust control points as necessary.

  • Track where errors were caught and where improvements are needed.

Step 5: Continuous Monitoring and Iteration

AI processes are dynamic—so your Control Matrix should be, too.

  • Schedule regular audits.

  • Implement real-time monitoring dashboards.

  • Adapt controls based on emerging risks or changes in regulations.

Example: If an AI-driven process starts producing forecasts that deviate from historical accuracy, initiate a deeper audit of input data and calculation logic.

A well-structured AI Control Matrix:

  • Minimizes risk: By catching errors before they escalate.

  • Ensures compliance: With clear checkpoints for validation.

  • Boosts trust: By demonstrating a commitment to oversight and accuracy.

The Trust but Verify approach allows you to harness the power of AI-driven automation without losing oversight. It builds confidence in automated processes while protecting against costly errors.

Deeper Dive: Designing a Control Matrix for the Accounts Payable Process

In the main section, we explored the Trust but Verify principle and how to design a robust AI Control Matrix. Now, let’s bring this concept to life with a concrete, step-by-step example: Accounts Payable (AP) Process.

Accounts Payable is a perfect candidate for AI-driven automation, but it also demands strategic controls to avoid errors, fraud, and compliance risks. Below is a typical AP process breakdown and where key control points should be placed.

Step 1: Invoice Receipt and Data Extraction

Process: Incoming invoices are scanned and processed using OCR (Optical Character Recognition) to extract details such as vendor name, amount, date, and payment terms.

Control Points:

  • Spot checks for invoices above a certain threshold ($10,000+) or invoices flagged for discrepancies.

  • Verification of key invoice details like vendor name, payment terms, and total amount against the purchase order for selected invoices.

  • Review of invoices with unusual formats (e.g., handwritten or non-standard layouts) that OCR may misinterpret.

Why? OCR is reliable for structured invoices but can fail on handwritten or non-standard formats. Key checks ensure critical invoices are processed correctly.

Step 2: Invoice Matching

Process: The system attempts to match the invoice against the Purchase Order (PO) and Delivery Receipt.

Control Points:

  • Mismatches (e.g., quantity discrepancies, price differences) are reviewed before processing.

  • Multi-invoice POs are verified to ensure all items are accounted for.

  • Validation that partial shipments and multiple deliveries align with the terms of the original PO.

Why? There is a high risk of errors when dealing with partial deliveries or vendor pricing changes. Proper verification prevents incorrect payments.

Step 3: Invoice Approval

Process: Invoices that pass matching are routed for approval based on predefined authorization levels (e.g., invoices below $5,000 are auto-approved; higher amounts require further review).

Control Points:

  • Verification for invoices above the auto-approve limit.

  • Review of invoices from new vendors or those that exceed typical spend thresholds.

  • Cross-check of payment terms against vendor agreements to ensure compliance.

Why? Fraudulent invoices and vendor errors are more likely with high-value transactions or new vendors. Manual review reduces these risks.

Step 4: Payment Scheduling

Process: Once approved, the system schedules payments according to the agreed-upon terms.

Control Points:

  • Confirmation of payment schedules against vendor terms before release.

  • Validation of any adjustments to the payment schedule, such as early payment discounts or deferred payments.

  • Sampling of scheduled payments for verification to detect duplicate transactions or incorrect amounts.

Why? Payment terms are sometimes adjusted based on vendor agreements, and mismatches can lead to missed discounts or overpayments.

Step 5: Reconciliation and Reporting

Process: At month-end, AP records are reconciled against general ledger entries and bank statements.

Control Points:

  • Final review of reconciliation reports to ensure all payments match invoices and purchase orders.

  • Examination of flagged transactions, especially those with large variances or manual overrides.

  • Cross-check against bank statements to validate payment completion and detect discrepancies.

Why? Month-end reconciliations affect financial reporting and compliance. Detailed reviews help catch anomalies before they impact financial statements.

An effective AI Control Matrix doesn’t just prevent mistakes—it builds trust—trust in your data, trust in your automation, and trust in your ability to lead with confidence. By strategically placing control points where they matter most, you can scale your AI-driven processes securely and efficiently.

Closing Thoughts

The true power of an AI Control Matrix lies in its ability to transform risk into reliability. When controls are thoughtfully designed and strategically placed, they prevent errors and enhance the integrity of your entire process. It's not about restricting automation; it's about ensuring that automation works in harmony with your organizational goals, delivering fast and dependable results.

By understanding When to Trust and When to Verify, you unlock the full potential of AI without sacrificing oversight or accountability. This is the kind of structure that not only supports growth but sustains it.

I’d love to hear your experiences—what challenges have you faced when scaling AI-driven automation? Hit reply and share your story. Let’s make sure your automation is built to last.

We Want Your Feedback!

This newsletter is for you, and we want to make it as valuable as possible. Please reply to this email with your questions, comments, or topics you'd like to see covered in future issues. Your input shapes our content!

Want to dive deeper into balanced AI adoption for your finance team? Or do you want to hire an AI-powered CFO? Book a consultation! 

Did you find this newsletter helpful? Forward it to a colleague who might benefit!

Until next Tuesday, keep balancing!

Anna Tiomina 
AI-Powered CFO

Reply

or to participate.