Rule-Based vs. AI-Based Automation: Choosing the Right Tool

As CFOs and finance professionals, we're constantly seeking ways to improve efficiency, accuracy, and insights in our operations. Automation has long been a key tool in our arsenal, but with the age of AI, the choices and possibilities have expanded. Understanding when to use rule-based automation versus AI-based solutions – and how to combine them effectively – is becoming a critical skill for finance leaders.

In this issue, we'll examine the strengths and weaknesses of both approaches, provide a framework for choosing the right tool for different financial tasks, and share a real-world case study on implementing a balanced automation strategy in budgeting.

I'm Anna, a practicing CFO who's really into AI. My mission is to empower finance professionals with AI-enhanced tools that amplify their skills and insights. Join me as we balance the books and the bytes, creating a smarter financial future together!

The Balanced View: Rule-Based vs. AI-Based Automation in Finance

Finance leaders have long relied on rule-based automation to streamline their processes. These systems, built on predefined rules and logic, have served us well in handling routine, predictable tasks. They're precise, consistent, and their decision-making process is transparent – critical features in the world of finance.

Enter AI. With its ability to learn from data, adapt to changing conditions, and handle complex, unstructured information, AI promises to revolutionize financial operations. It can uncover hidden patterns, make nuanced predictions, and even process natural language.

But it's not about choosing one over the other. It's about understanding the strengths and limitations of each approach and knowing when to apply them.

Rule-based automation excels in scenarios where:

• The process is well-defined and consistent.

• Compliance and audit trails are critical.

• The logic behind decisions needs to be explicit and easily understood.

AI-based automation shines when:

• Dealing with large volumes of complex, unstructured data.

• The environment is dynamic, requiring constant adaptation.

• Predictive analytics and pattern recognition are needed.

Consider accounts payable processing. Rule-based automation can efficiently handle invoice matching, approval workflows, and payment scheduling based on predefined criteria. But what about detecting potential fraud or optimizing payment timing for cash flow management? AI can add significant value here.

Similarly, in financial reporting, rule-based automation can handle the bulk of data aggregation and standard report generation. AI can then step in to provide predictive analytics, anomaly detection, and natural language generation for report narratives.

By leveraging rule-based automation for structured, compliance-sensitive tasks and AI for complex analysis and decision support, we can create robust, adaptive financial systems that are both efficient and insightful.

As finance leaders, our role is evolving. We need to understand these technologies, their applications, and their implications. We must be able to guide our teams in implementing the right mix of automation tools, ensuring we maintain control and transparency while harnessing the power of AI.

In the next sections, we'll explore a real-world example of this balanced approach and provide practical tips for evaluating which type of automation to use for different financial tasks.

Case Study: The Right Balance in Budgeting

In our journey to implement a balanced approach to automation in financial processes, I'd like to share a real-world example of a company that's currently revolutionizing its budgeting process.

In my previous newsletter, I introduced a company incorporating AI-driven data analysis and forecasting into its budgeting process. Building on that foundation, the company is now implementing a system that balances rule-based and AI-based automation throughout the budgeting cycle. I am guiding them through this process, and though it is not finished yet, I'd like to share the approach and the interim results.

We began by conducting a comprehensive audit of the company's budgeting processes. This allowed us to classify each process as either a candidate for rule-based automation or AI-based enhancement. With this classification in hand, we then prioritized and defined specific areas for implementation.

For example, data collection and preparation were manual, and the company had many different report formats that needed to be unified. Now, rule-based automation (Excel Power Query) is used to collect the reports, and then we use AI (ChatGPT) to clean the data, fill in missing values, and format the reports.

Once the actuals are collected, we perform variance analysis using simple formulas, a task straightforward enough that AI isn't required. However, AI (ChatGPT) is used to provide comments on report variance and identify the main performance drivers.

The company operates in a very dynamic environment and aims to adjust budgets monthly. This is done with both AI and rules. We have formulas providing the updated budget for the next months based on actual performance and previous budget versions, but we also regularly ask AI to identify trends and dependencies in the data and suggest forecast scenarios based on those.

As we are still early in this process, we don't feel comfortable letting AI or formulas define the future budgets, but we use both inputs and decide with the team which scenario we want to go with. This is an important decision affecting many internal stakeholders, and we feel that using human judgment is critical here.

As I mentioned in my webinar last week (and if you missed it, you can watch the replay here), I enjoy the interactive dashboard feature in Claude. With this specific company, we use Claude's dashboard for the monthly business reviews instead of preparing classic PowerPoint presentations. We are experimenting with KPIs and visualizations, and until we define a standard set of KPIs, we feel these interactive dashboards are the right tool. When the budgeting process is set up and we all agree on the KPIs and the visualization format, we'll consider automating the dashboard in BI as this will provide more reliable output.

Trying to balance AI-based automation and rule-based automation in the budgeting process has been an exciting journey so far. I am also happy to see that the company's team is becoming more and more adept at using AI as we go forward. They bring a lot of great suggestions on how to use AI in other processes. This is one of the biggest benefits of having an AI-powered CFO - the teams that are exposed to AI and are involved in the AI implementation soon find multiple ways to use AI in the processes that they perform daily.

Decision Framework: Rule-Based vs. AI-Based

Use the following framework to decide between rule-based and AI-based automation for a specific task:

1. Task Complexity: Is the task simple and repetitive?

   Yes → Rule-based;

   No → AI-based;

   AI excels at handling tasks that can't be easily described with rules, while rule-based systems are efficient for straightforward, repetitive processes.

2. Data Structure: Is the data structured and consistent?

   Yes → Rule-based;

   No → AI-based;

   Rule-based automation works well with structured data, while AI can make sense of unstructured or variable data formats.

3. Volume and Velocity: Is the data volume low to medium?

   Yes → Rule-based;

   No → AI-based;

   AI systems are designed to handle and process large volumes of data quickly, making them suitable for high-volume or high-velocity data environments.

4. Transparency: Is a clear audit trail necessary?

   Yes → Rule-based;

   No → AI-based;

   Rule-based systems offer straightforward logic trails, ideal for processes requiring high transparency. AI systems can be more opaque but offer powerful insights.

5. Adaptability: Is the operating environment stable?

   Yes → Rule-based;

   No → AI-based Explanation;

   AI systems can adapt to changing conditions and learn from new data, making them ideal for dynamic environments. Rule-based systems excel in stable, predictable contexts.

6. Precision vs. Insight: Is consistent, precise execution the priority?

   Yes → Rule-based;

   No → AI-based Explanation:

   Rule-based systems ensure consistent execution of predefined rules. AI systems are better when deeper insights or pattern recognition are needed.

   Remember - the magic happens when you get the best of two worlds!

AI News of the Week: California's AI Safety Bill Veto

California Governor Gavin Newsom recently vetoed SB 1047, a bill that would have implemented the nation's most stringent AI safety regulations. This decision has important implications for us all.

Key Points:

• The vetoed bill would have made tech companies legally liable for harms caused by AI models.

• It would have required a "kill switch" for AI systems in case of misuse or malfunction.

• The bill mandated safety tests on powerful AI models.

This veto brings to the forefront the constant tension in the AI community between innovation and regulation. As finance professionals, we often find ourselves on the side of increased regulation, given our industry's heavy reliance on trust, stability, and risk management. Many of us see the value in clear rules and oversight. This often puts us at odds with the "move fast and break things" mentality prevalent in some tech circles.

However, the veto also raises important questions: How do we balance the need for AI innovation with safety and accountability? Can self-regulation suffice, or do we need government intervention to ensure responsible AI development?

This veto may seem to favor innovation, but it also puts more responsibility on companies to ensure safe and ethical AI use. 

While this particular bill was vetoed, the debate it has sparked is far from over. We will keep watching.

Closing Thoughts

As we've explored in this issue, the future of finance lies not in choosing between rule-based and AI-based automation, but in skillfully combining both. By understanding the strengths and limitations of each approach, we can create financial systems that are both robust and adaptive, efficient and insightful.

The key is to maintain a balanced perspective. Embrace the power of AI, but don't neglect the clarity and control offered by rule-based systems. And always remember that these tools are here to augment, not replace, human expertise.

We Want Your Feedback!

This newsletter is for you, and we want to make it as valuable as possible. Please reply to this email with your questions, comments, or topics you'd like to see covered in future issues. Your input shapes our content!

If, like many companies, you feel that AI is a great tool that could save you and your team hours and enhance your processes, but don't know where to start, I've got you covered. I have a comprehensive framework that will guide you through the AI implementation challenges and accelerate your path to success. This framework includes step-by-step guidance on assessing your needs, choosing the right AI tools, and integrating them into your existing processes, ensuring a smooth transition to AI-enhanced financial operations.

Want to dive deeper into balanced AI adoption for your team? Or do you want to hire an AI-powered CFO? Book a consultation! 

Did you find this newsletter helpful? Forward it to a colleague who might benefit!

Until next Tuesday, keep balancing!

Anna Tiomina 
CFO & AI Enthusiast