The True Cost of AI from a CFO’s Lens

Welcome to This Week’s Issue!

As AI projects become more common, CFOs are expected to do more than approve AI budgets—they must assess financial viability, calculate ROI, and strategically allocate AI investments.

The discussion about AI adoption often emphasizes capabilities and security, yet one crucial aspect is often overlooked: cost structure.

Should your company opt for a pay-as-you-go closed-source AI model or invest in an on-premises open-source solution? What are the long-term financial trade-offs between these approaches? At what point does on-prem AI become more cost-effective than cloud-based APIs?

In this article, we’ll break down the real costs of AI implementation, compare closed-source vs. open-source financial models, and help CFOs make informed, numbers-driven decisions about AI adoption.

The Balanced View: The CFO’s Perspective on Open-Source vs. Closed-Source AI

This is the third and final edition in our series on AI models. In our previous discussions, we explored the differences between closed-source and open-source AI models and the cloud vs. on-premises deployment debate.

There are multiple factors that influence an AI adoption strategy—security, compliance, scalability, and customization—but today, we focus on what CFOs care about most: the financial aspects of these choices.

When implementing AI, companies evaluate two key dimensions:

1️⃣ Cloud vs. On-Premises Deployment
2️⃣ Closed-Source vs. Open-Source Models

1. Cloud-Based vs. On-Premises AI Deployment

When to Choose Cloud-Based AI

✔️ You need fast deployment without heavy IT investment.
✔️ Your AI usage is flexible and needs to scale with demand.
✔️ Your team lacks AI/IT expertise to maintain an in-house system.
✔️ You're using closed-source AI models like OpenAI's GPT-4 or Google’s Gemini.

When to Choose On-Premises AI

✔️ Your organization prioritizes security and compliance (e.g., banks, insurance firms, regulated industries).
✔️ AI processing needs to be fast with minimal latency.
✔️ You plan to fine-tune AI models on internal data that cannot be shared externally.
✔️ Long-term cost efficiency is a priority (despite high initial investment).

2. Open-Source vs. Closed-Source AI Models

The cloud vs. on-prem decision is closely linked to whether you choose open-source or closed-source AI models.

When to Choose Closed-Source AI

✔️ You need a plug-and-play AI assistant that works immediately.
✔️ You want minimal IT overhead and don’t need customization.
✔️ You’re using AI for general financial analysis, reporting, or chat-based automation.

When to Choose Open-Source AI

✔️ You require full control over your AI model.
✔️ You want to fine-tune AI on proprietary financial data.
✔️ You’re concerned about vendor lock-in and want long-term independence.
✔️ Your company deals with highly sensitive financial or customer data.

The Cost Structures of AI Deployment

1. Closed-Source AI: Pay-as-You-Go, But Costs Scale Up

Closed-source models allow companies to start using AI instantly with no infrastructure investment. You pay per token processed, and API-based models are continuously updated by vendors.

📌 Key Insight: Closed-source AI is predictable at low usage but can become prohibitively expensive when scaling up.

2. Open-Source AI: Higher Upfront Investment, Lower Long-Term Cost

Deploying an on-premises open-source AI model requires an initial investment in infrastructure, but once set up, costs stabilize and become significantly lower than closed-source models.

📌 Key Insight: Open-source AI requires an upfront investment but becomes significantly cheaper within 10-12 months.

Break-Even Analysis: When Does Open-Source Become Cheaper?

📌 Key Insight: Open-source AI requires an upfront investment but becomes significantly cheaper within ~10.5 months, with costs around $625 per month compared to $2,000 for closed-source AI. For high-volume AI processing, open-source deployment offers substantial long-term cost savings despite initial setup expenses.

Real-World Case Studies

1. Retail Banking Chatbot Deployment

Scenario: Managing 5M monthly customer interactions (500 tokens per query).

• Closed-Source AI (GPT-4o): $75,000/month

• Open-Source AI (Mistral Large): $68,000/month after 14-month break-even period.

• Outcome: Open-source saves $84K annually post break-even.

2. Hedge Fund Predictive Analytics

Scenario: Processing real-time market data (20M tokens/hour).

• Closed-Source AI (Claude 3 Opus): $480,000/day (too expensive).

• Open-Source AI (Llama 3 + custom GPUs): $210,000/day.

• Outcome: 56% cost reduction favors open-source AI for ultra-high volume use cases.

Strategic Recommendations for Finance Leaders

✅ Low/Medium Volume (Under 300M tokens/year) – Closed-source AI is the best option due to its flexibility and lower upfront cost.

✅ High Volume (500M+ tokens/year) – Open-source AI provides ROI within 12–18 months despite higher initial investment.

✅ Hybrid Approach – Use closed-source for regulatory tasks and open-source for high-volume analytics & forecasting.

Choosing the right AI deployment strategy is not just a technical decision—it’s a financial one. If you’re evaluating AI adoption and need a cost comparison tailored to your business, I can help. Assessing AI financials, calculating break-even points, and guiding AI model choices is part of my service offerings.

📩 Let’s discuss your AI deployment strategy—reach out to start the conversation.

Closing Thoughts

This article marks the end of our series on AI models, but in many ways, it’s just the beginning of the broader conversation about AI in finance. If you’ve been following along, you may have noticed a pattern—we’ve been going deeper with each edition, exploring not just what AI is but how it works, how to choose the right models, and now, how to evaluate its financial impact.

This progression isn’t accidental. It reflects how the world is changing and what’s increasingly expected from CFOs. AI is now a core business function that demands financial oversight, strategic decision-making, and technical understanding.

The role of CFOs is evolving. Mastering AI’s cost structures, ROI models, and deployment strategies is becoming as essential as financial forecasting or risk management.

We Want Your Feedback!

This newsletter is for you, and we want to make it as valuable as possible. Please reply to this email with your questions, comments, or topics you'd like to see covered in future issues. Your input shapes our content!

Want to dive deeper into balanced AI adoption for your finance team? Or do you want to hire an AI-powered CFO? Book a consultation! 

Did you find this newsletter helpful? Forward it to a colleague who might benefit!

Until next Tuesday, keep balancing!

Anna Tiomina 
AI-Powered CFO